osed125 said:
colafitte said:
osed125 said:
Seece said:
Sorry but from what was promised at E3, to what I see now, this looks crap. Disappointed, really wanted to like this. Makes me worry for the Division. |
Are graphics really that important to people nowadays? the gameplay is the same as before so because it got "downgraded" that means is crap now? seriously what the hell...
If you didn't like the game, it should have been from the very beggining...
|
Yes, is important for inmersive games that try to recreate a world as real as possible, like for example a racer sim like Gran Turismo tries to be.
Basically, graphical fidelity is part of the gameplay in games like this, because if its graphics are so real that you think that what you saw is almost real, you feel more inmersed in the gameplay. That's why the industry push the technology.
The fact that people was hyped for something already announced that will never exist, doesnt' help either. It's like that 15 min demo of Bioshock Infinite that looked way better that the final result.
|
So that means all sandbox games with bad graphics are crap. If you check the Gamespot video you'll see it looks somewhat similar to GTA V (keep in mind the stream compression), so that means GTA V is crap?
|
No, it means Watch Dogs 2014 looks worse than Watch Dogs 2012. That's what it makes disappointing. A lot of people like me, was excited of that degree of fidelity, and now, after 2 years what we get, is a GTA V level of graphics with more resolution and better fps. That's not what we expected..., at all.
Edit: If not 2012 levels, at least 2013 levels.
