Kasz216 said:
It's just that they've been a huge failure in this country. Your very first Wikipedia link admits as much. If the Wall Street Journal can't get behind a repiblican fiscal policy you've got a serious problem. The best way to fix the economy is to start at home first. In otherwords fix government spending. Neither Kensyian or Supply Side economics really work so much as you need a balance between them, the current balance is way to far towards supply side. |
Kasz I never had a doubt you knew what Supply Side economics are. It was directed at Final-Fan.
"In 2003, the Wall Street Journal declared the debate over supply-side economics to have ended "with a whimper" after extensive modeling performed by the Congressional Budget Office failed to support the most extreme claims of supply-side policies."
I assure you my biggest problem with the government is government spending as well.
Also on a seprate note did you get a chance to read Greenspan's article?
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/edbdbcf6-f360-11dc-b6bc-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1
![]() | "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked. | |

ioi + 1








