By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ganoncrotch said:


and you are ignoring my original " I simply had not replied due to your mildly confrontation enticing tone of reply but what the bold and underlined here," I asked in my first question to you had you seen the technical requirements of running the wind waker as in what was going on the the background, you replied "yes I have" you want me to go googling the same thing you've already read and chose to ignore? No I can't be bothered and like I said I don't like your tone in any replies it's the reason I am not going to reply to you again, not because of "points" made just simply your tone of writing does not invite conversation imo, at least not mine.


We all know you're not adressing this part of my reply to you because you have no idea what you're talking about. You're assuming things but have nothing to support your stance.

You made that clear enough.