Kasz216 on 17 March 2008
| kenzomatic said: It's an endless debate but here are some links (for informational purposes i'm not arguing, most will include point and counter point) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplier_%28economics%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marginal_propensity_to_consume http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggregate_demand |
I know what Supply Side economis are.
It's just that they've been a huge failure in this country. Your very first Wikipedia link admits as much.
If the Wall Street Journal can't get behind a repiblican fiscal policy you've got a serious problem. The best way to fix the economy is to start at home first. In otherwords fix government spending.
Neither Kensyian or Supply Side economics really work so much as you need a balance between them, the current balance is way to far towards supply side.
