By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou on 03 March 2014
Edit Thread
Cj2i3 said:
Zekkyou said:

Well that's very debatable :P And completely irrelevant anyway. I've said numerous times how pointless it is to compare games like Ryse's SP and Killzone's SP. Comparing 3rd person to FPS is always a little silly, but fairly comparing two games with completely different visual priorities is close to impossible (hence being very debatable).

Regardless, anyone saying it's closer to the WiiU than PS4 is just being an idiot. There is no doubt it's weaker than the PS4, and by a decent (but not huge) chunk, but it's a lot closer to the PS4 than WiiU.

Just making a point, some make too huge of a deal out of the XB1 specs. Though your correct I shouldn't have said its the best looking console game, it's one of the best. 

And while Killzone does look quite beautiful I was under the impression it was running at 1920x1080 at around 60 FPS in regards to multiplayer. So somewhat dissapointing to hear, for me atleast.

The multi-player is still 1080p on your TV, it's just very odd about it (visually it appears as 1080p with an odd motion blur). To be honest i get the impression they just rushed the multi-player (which wouldn't be hugely surprising for a launch game, but still disappointing). While i can understand the advantages of the method they are using, the single player ran at native 1080p/30-40fps. The method used for the MP cuts back on the resources required by a hell of a lot, that extra power should be producing more than it is :/

I agree what you're saying about specs though. Give it a few years and the only place we will see the power difference in full will be in 1st party games. While it will certainly be a nice bonus for PS4 owners, 1st party games make up such a small minority of a console's library that it's not worth people screaming high and low over it.