Zekkyou said:
Except it's only technically sub HD. Your TV is still showing you 1920 x 1080 pixels without up-scaling, the game is just use an oddball method of doing it. Having the full 1080p being rendered per frame is definitely preferable (dat sweet sweet SP), but as a way to give the frame rate a big bump with relatively little impact on the games visuals, it's an excellent method. People have said in the past they noticed an odd sort of motion blur in the MP (caused by this method), but no one could really pin it down since the game was still technically showing 1920 x 1080 pixels on your TV. As Joe said, it's pretty much just 1080i. It's silly to involve it in the 720p/900p/1080p arguments. |
LOL @ "well its only technically sub HD".
Upscaled 1080p is apparently unacceptable. That's what we have been hammered with since the consoles launched. And haha @ relatively little impact on visuals. I guess, if you like MP that looks like it's been lathered in grease. I agree the SP looks great, but this thread isn't about the SP. What you are doing is making excuses for the developers having to cut corners to achieve sub HD performance and even doing that, they still could not hit the 60fps they told us the game ran at.
The Titanfall beta pushes more pixels than Killzone 6 MP, and people have been harsh as hell on the visuals and performance of it. Even have basically convinced themselves the 360 version will be identical. Again, it just goes to show all this petty bickering about superior resolution and a slightly high frame rate is a waste of time. Had someone not brought this to life, every Killzone 6 owner would still be living in ignorance, believing their game was full HD at 60fps when that's far from reality. Makes it funny when these same people then talk about how much smoother this 1080p version of Game A is over the 900p competition or oh man those extra 15 frames per second just really make it next gen LOL. All I will say on the matter.
