By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SvennoJ on 27 February 2014
Edit Thread
BenVTrigger said:
mind said:

According to this, you should have less than 20 avg fps in 4K(2mp more than their max. test res.)

It's just i want to play this beatiful game in 4K too, but there is no opportunity yet.

This is flat out wrong i get 65 - 70 FPS on Mirrors Edge with 16x Anti Aliasing, Max Settings, and 4k. Far cry only runs low due to it being open world. In fact its the only game I've every played that I can't 30 fps or higher at 4k.

Edit: also that link you posted doesn't take into consideration overclocking. Both my GPU and CPU are overclocked.

Edit 2: Just saw you said THIS game referring to Far Cry, my apologies. 

Screw playability, this is about what a render engine is capable of producing in the best of circumstances. We're already selecting the best vantage point to show of a good looking part of the game. In any fps 90% of the time you're hugging a wall with little visibility, where are those shots :p
Keep cranking up those settings!

I've always played fsx with a target of 20 fps. Perfectly playable. With fps and driving more is definitely better, but I learned to play fps with Doom on a 386, and 3D driving with the likes of Test drive 3 on a 286. 10-15 fps used to be great!