By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
HylianSwordsman said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

It is not blatent fanboyism. Wii U had no games in the beginning too. It's just an exaggeration. But whatever, you're clearly a Sony fanboy yourself, so you've no room to talk. Look, I like Sony, you don't need to defend them from me. I'm just not an optimist.

Also, as far as I'm concerned, if it's an MS IP, it's 1st party. Nintendo has outsourced Zelda and Mario before. Does that mean that Minish Cap, Luigi's Mansion 2, Ocarina of Time 3D, and the like are 3rd party? Of course not. Sony outsources a lot too. You're just twisting the words to support your argument.

I'm not defending Sony, I'm correcting you

To suggest Sony, wouldn't do what they did in the previous generation with the new console is baseless, and every console has games on launch. You can't just ignore them because you don't like them. That's an insult to both the developer and the fanbase.

I DO like them. But you obviously aren't listening to me.


No, you aren't listening to me.

You claimed that Sony doesn't have much money to invest, I countered that Sony has been investing in 1st parties especially when they lost the multiplat advantage to the 360. Your error is based on launch exclusives and completely ignores the fact that Sony is carrying its previous investments into this generation. It also ignores the fact that only 1 of Xb1 launch Exclusives was from a franchise MS owned, while with the exception of indies, both of Sony's exclusives are from franchises owned by Sony. Franchises produces games, buying a single ip just adds 1 game to the library, it's not a long term investment. You claim the software isn't selling the hardware now, that's valid, but it's barely been 3 months. The PS3 is still getting new games, to suggest that the PS4 would'nt have comparable support just because it had a good launch is ignoring everything that occurred before November 2013. The only thing that has changed between playstation and xbox is price, uk and us market share, and multiplat performance.

The no games argument isn't even relevant in 8th gen. In 7th gen, the 360 had huge advantages. While the ps4 has half the price advantage of 360 and virtually no headstart.


I am listening to you, I just disagree with you. This isn't about errors, this is about me having a different interpretation of things. Your interpretation isn't the only valid one.