Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
The Playstation 3 was in an objectively worse position than the Xbox 1, by a Company whose Assets are dwarfed by Microsofts. Sony's exclusives and studios pulled it up to tie the 360 which had a 1 year lead. Unless it has suddenly lost the capability to do what it did last generation there is no reason to think other wise. Playstation != Xbox and they are not interchangeable. Playstation also owns alot more ips and studios then Microsoft, so unless you started gaming in November, there is no reason to think Xbox will have more exclusives. Ryse | MS IP by Crytek (3rd party) DR3 | MS IP by Capcom (3rd party) Forza | Ms Franchise (2nd Party) KI | Idk but its outsourced too Also the whole "no games" is not only a worthless argument but its blantant fanboyism. Every console has had games at launch. News Flash: Even Knack has a fanbase (even though is widely considered as a poor launch exclusive. Don't bother using it. |
It is not blatent fanboyism. Wii U had no games in the beginning too. It's just an exaggeration. But whatever, you're clearly a Sony fanboy yourself, so you've no room to talk. Look, I like Sony, you don't need to defend them from me. I'm just not an optimist.
Also, as far as I'm concerned, if it's an MS IP, it's 1st party. Nintendo has outsourced Zelda and Mario before. Does that mean that Minish Cap, Luigi's Mansion 2, Ocarina of Time 3D, and the like are 3rd party? Of course not. Sony outsources a lot too. You're just twisting the words to support your argument.
