Leadified said:
Kasz216 said:
Leadified said:
You're already allowed to deny people of your services if they violate your rights. You're just not allowed to deny someone solely based on discrimination on things like race, sex or sexuality. All this bill does is give a legal defence to a business, so if a gay couple were to sue them they can't win because the business did not break the law.
|
Actually I'm pretty sure your totally allowed to deny people service soley due to sexuality. I mean

It might not be 1 to 1, but i gotta think refusal to service and being able to fire are fairly even in standing.
|
Makes the whole situation even less suprising then, similar laws were proposed in Kansas and Tennesee which are both orange states, so all in all the only reason they're passing this law is because why not, they might be able to get away with it.
|
Yeah it makes it realy confusing.. since it's totally redudant.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-arizona-gays-sb-1062-20140222,0,2958198.story?page=2
I can't understand the reasoning really.
Seems like political grandstanding for votes.