Mr Khan said:
SocialistSlayer said:
Mr Khan said:
The more interesting one is that an interpretation of this law could open up for discrimination in other regards, like if a Muslim waiter at a general-purpose restaurant begins refusing to even handle anything with pork in the ingredients, and demanded he can still keep the job. I wonder what the advocates of the law would say in that case?
|
no, because said muslim waiter was volunterly offering his services and the business was volunterly employing him. No one was forced to do anything, he is free to leave, and the business is free to fire him.
back to the Op, the business should be able to volunterrly offer their services, and customers should be able to volunterly accept their service. You are advocating for compulsery labor, which is slavery.
|
Right. If you are voluntarily offering your business, you are perfectly free to shut it down should you not be able to conduct business without discriminating. No one is forced to do anything. Nobody's forcing you to bake wedding cakes, after all.
|
no but youre also free to bake or not to bake wedding cakes. does the phrase "we reserve the right to refuse service" ring any bells.
also nobody forced the customers to go to that place of business either.