@freedquaker: ... What you are saying is similar to: Consoles performance suck just by making an average of power and install base (this time it would be of Ps3, x360 with the Ps4 and xboxOne) putting all inside the same bucket... (Having xbox360 and ps3 the biggest install base)
You know that almost all of those shitty hd4000 video cards belong to people who are not really representative of the people that argue how powerful the Ps4 and xboxOne consoles are against PC. Do you think the next Crysis or Assassins Creed (on the PC) is targeted to those people with the HD4000 cards or to people with better GPUs? (a tip: just go and check benchmarks and see how badly the HD4000 run any of those games... so you will get an idea that an HD4000 does not represente the idea of "gaming on PC").
Also if you teach economics by your way of viewing things (I am inventing numbers) then if 51% of people earn $2000 and the rest (49%) earns 3 billion dollars then you will say that the earnings of that population is $2000 because its % is bigger?, sorry but that is flawed...
If you want a good comparison, then dig deep and check the computing power of each video card that was in the survey, the same with CPU and then make an average of the total power and then compare it to the power on next gen consoles. If you could have done the same last gen the difference that time would have bigger, and that is what people are arguing saying that this time consoles are weak.... They dont have high end hardware, nobody says that their are too weak... They just got mid to low range hardware that gets better performance because of closer to the metal programming but that would be it...
PD: If that is your way of viewing things then (graphics concerned) gaming on a console sucks balls....
