starcraft said:
Are you going to tell me in all honesty that on a "limited" budget you bought a PS3 as a Blu-Ray player because you had a "feeling" the format would win? I'll want Versus when it comes out in 2009/10, but I didn't buy a PS3 at twice what it will cost in 2009, in 2006. Sony had no games in 2006 and for most of 2007, but 5 million people bought the console at full price in that period, just like Sony said they would. Sony may be arrogant, but they are often right.
|
Yes, I am. First of all, I said ''relatively" limited budget. It didn't break me. I was at student at the time, I was working part time, so I had a bit of extra cash to spend. **and to be fair, I sold my launch PS3 on ebay ( shamelessly for $1200 =) ), only to buy a $600 one in Feb '07.
As I said, I wanted SOME next gen gaming, wanted an HD movie player, eventually wanted FFXIII and had little interest in what the 360 offered at the time (sure if blue dragon/lost odyssey were out at the time, I may have went the other way). So this makes me a fool? As well as 5 million other people? Surely some, if not many, of them are fools. But to make such a blanket statement as you have and continue to stand by, generalizing 5 million people without knowing their jusifications for their purchases, calling them names (fools) and then complain in other threads where people call you names, asking for them to be banned (which I beleive you were in the right) is nothing less than being hypocritical, is it not?
I apologize if I come off as a jackass here, I just don't appreciate being generalized nor, like you, being needlessly called names.