| freedquaker said: a) will be able play games on resolution over 1080p but most TVs don't support that b) will be able to sustain 60 fps more often, but the perceived impact is much less subtle. c) yes, high end PCs will possibly have better AA, a bit more refined detail etc, but that's it. c) more RAM (than 5 GB) will not utilized for a long time in games d) PS4 will always have more stable drivers, with better CPU utilizations, and customization. so when you look at this way, the performance gap between Playstation and the PC had never been this small, and playstation had never been this capable compared to the competition of its era. So, no, PS4 is not a weak console at all. XB1 could have been nearly as good if only they had taken the right decisions with the RAM bandwidth and architecture. |
The performance gap between the PS4 (the newest console) and the newest PC game tech is massive. (doesnt make sense to compare it to "average" pc)
If it makes you feel better to say "no thats not fair, you have to compare it to the average pc not the new high end stuff", then thats just cherry picking the situation, i wouldnt say "my new ford fiesta is faster than any nissan!", then whine and say the GT-R and every other faster car doesnt count because the average persons nissan isnt fast.
You compare the latest tech for consoles with the latest tech from PCs, and what you get is a gap just as wide now, as its always been.







