MGS V: Ground Zeroes Console Quality Comparison Video

[VitroBahllee]

Seece said:

Saebid said:

VitroBahllee said:

Allowing users to accrue a reputation IS fair.

I don't think so.

User1 "Hello fellas" = Ban
User2 "Hello fellas" = Cool

This is the most unfair thing ever... the reputation was to be used to decide how log the ban is not a subjective way to decide if a comment is a troll or not.

What I mean is... in case of doubt if a use is trolling or not what do you will do? Ban if you dislike him or do nothing if you like him.

No law in the world condenates a mulder because the reputation... they chance the decision (how much time it will be condened) due the reputation.

You're looking at it black and white. You were banned because the mods thought your post was insincere and thus provocative. If it had come from a Nintendo fan there would be no doubt they were sincere and actually sad about it not coming to WiiU.

We only have your word for you saying you're sad about it, but of course you're going to defend yourself.

Your example is poor as well, if any user started posting racial abused ect they would received punishment no matter who they are. But for things like this it isn't cut and dry.

 

Seece is right. You are hearing the word 'reputation' and not realizing it doesn't mean "They treated you differently on the one thing you said because of your reputation." What it means is 'This last thing isn't the major reason we're banning you, it's because you ALWAYS say rude stuff.'

Arguing over how bannable this last thing is doesn't matter. It was the 'straw that broke the camels back.' The sum of all the inciting stuff you've said from your last ban is what got you banned.

 

It's like saying there's a 1,000 word limit on something. You type five hundred words, then another five hundred words, then add one more word. "It's just a word!" Yes, but it adds up to the other ones to make 1,001.