| That Guy said: How would you rank the MGS games from MGS to MGS 3 and where do you think MGS4 will be in the canon of MGS games?
I'd say:
1) MGS because its the classic. Perfect in gameplay and storyline. ==> ok 2) MGS: Twin Snakes, only because it updated the graphics and kept the storyline intact. Loved it. ==> I didnt like the news 3d cutscene but ok 3) MGS2: Gameplay was good-- but there was something about Raiden that I hated. Also I have like a -1 for the trainwreck they call a storyline. I don't understand it at all to this day. Too many meaningless plot twists to keep track of and WHAT? Liquid's hand takes over Ocelot? That's just stupid. ==> that is a good point but I want to say something that I have found on a major MGS internet site (unofficial MGS site) : MGS3 SPOILING Ocelot is the son of "The SORROW" and this guy has some psychic power (a bit like Mantis except he is able to talk to dead people and read future more than controlling people). It is possible Ocelot has some psychical power too but he is not really aware of them and not able to control them totally. That may explain Liquid is able to take the control throw his "arm". SPOILING END 4) MGS3: Snake Eater - I really can't say too much about this one as I was so disgusted with MGS2 and I never got around to it. ==> u should try it if you liked MGS1 because it linked to MGS1, the story is less crazy than MGS2. The MGS4 gameplay is in the bag-- I hope they don't mess with the tried and true formula. And I doubt the story is going to be as stupid as MGS2 so I hope-- HOPE that it will be at least better than MGS2. ==> I think gameplay will allow more possibilities principally during heavy fight (when u dont have to snake).
|
Time to Work !
