supernihilist said:
starworld said:
JoeTheBro said:
starworld said:
JoeTheBro said:
Specs are great evidence but they don't tell us the full story. The real world result of the specs is what really matter. Also which non launch multiplats run much worse on Wii U? Most are almost on par if not better.
|
AC4 runs 5-15 fps behind current gen and looks the same, same for batman, ninaj gaiden 3 and COD ghosts, resident evil revelations and splinter cell also called worse versions by DF, the only game that is superior NFSWU. specs also do tell the full story, just look at ryse that looks a generion better then anything on wiiu.
|
Except for AC4 the games you listed are almost on par, not much worse like you said.
|
go read the digitial foundry its says both batman orgins and cod ghosts run so bad on wiiu thats there almost no fun, compared to the 360/ps3 versions, samething for ninja gaiden 3, that only games that are close are RE and splintercell, try doing some research before making such a silly thread.
|
talking about hyperbole...
i think that has more to do with unpolished product than with HW power. do i have to remind you how most multiplats look and run worst on PS3 compared to 360? Wasnt PS3 moar powerful?
Bayonetta perhaps? it has do with hard power
|
it has everything to do with hardware power. ps3 was not more powerful, they both had there strenghts and weak points, but ps3 was a pain to develope for, wiiu doesnt have the same problem, if ports are running worse then you know that console is weaker not powerful enough for it to matter and were not talking about one port, were talking about most.
