By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad on 18 February 2014
Edit Thread
bigtakilla said:
Hynad said:
bigtakilla said:
Hynad said:
bigtakilla said:

XV looked like XIII, limited explorable areas and one player with one weapon. X is online multiplayer, sandbox, and much more diverse in combat. if smoothness (which I felt was no smoother than X) is all you're looking for (because you give no examples for impressiveness) then keep swallowing the S-E gravy. 

[...]

I got my details of the World by the several trailers they have showed over the course of nearly a decade. And if I;m not allowed to go off of that, then why are you alloud to, lol. Double standard much? Also expand on faster paced, battle actions are far faster as well as World exploration is far faster in X. (unless you meant neither of those things, as I said I need clarification.) 


All those things you say about FF XV... You take them out of your ass. Limited explorable areas? Looks like XIII? Compared to X?

Please, do elaborate. I could enjoy a good laugh from someone who's clearly swallowing an other brand's gravy.


See any XV trailer ever. PS: It's easier to do with S-E's balls out of your face.


Hey, I'm all ears. You're the one bringing it up. Go. Do elaborate. Don't be a coward.

You really want to do this, lol. Fine. Stop me when you see a massive open sand box World or multiplayer. Lol. 

http://youtu.be/ACSpgGAjGfM

Yeah, no sandbox open World, no multiplayer of any sort, in fact all I see mostly is a lot of rooms and closed off streets. I guess there was that one grassy area, but with no map we can pretty much conclude there will be no getting lost in there, lol. (It is a Final Fantasy after all). 

Then let's talk about the battle scenes. An ARPG with the standard attack, item, summon, art, magic, and teleport (not all of there can be used at all times). The characters seem to be limited to using one weapon (though of course you can get better weapons as the game goes on). 

Monolithsoft has character sword/gun, mech sword/gun/rocket, arts, items, link attacks, magic. Thes two share pretty much the same things, with X being more in depth with multiple weapons and mechs available which can fight on ground or in the air. 

As I said, limited. 


You're being ridiculous. You pretend to know everything a game will offer based on teaser trailers that don't highlight any gameplay elements with an ounce of depth.

You're the one with an agenda. And it stinks. With this kind of attitude, you have absolutely no place to call anyone biased the way you did a few times in this tread already.

No maps, so you can't get lost? Maybe pressing select will make that map appear? Maybe the game wasn't yet set in stone at the time of that trailer? No sand box? Where's the sand box in X? Xenoblade wasn't sandbox. It was your typical JRPG fare with a stellar execution. A big world map to explore, the same as Dragon Quest VIII, for example. Now the battle scene... What are you on about? The both of them have different battle system. Now, you do know pretty much how X will play like. No very difficult, after all, the developer said it will be just like Xenoblade but with more polish... Now, FF XV? Nope, you have next to no idea how this one will play like. You base everything on assumptions your biased mind made up. There could be many explanations for anything you see in the trailers. Yet you come up with the most negative ones you can imagine to suit your retarded agenda.

The fact that you need to trash something to make your favoured game look better speaks greatly of your bias. Proving that discussing anything with you is an exercise in folly that can't be met with any sound reasoning and good faith.