Legend11 said:
That's exactly what you're doing... It would be like me going into the Sony forum and asking "What if Sony started losing 2.5 billion a year for the next 7 years, would it be the end of the Playstation brand?" Do you think that would even be worth discussing? The system has only been on the market for 3 months and is selling faster than 360 did. So why not at least wait to see if it actually runs into trouble before making threads with imaginary disaster scenarios. |
Nope, selling 30M isn't doom, as gen 6 proved.
And we have several threads about sony bankrupcy, and most would agree that if sony loses 3B a year it would close before ps5 but wouldn't cut support of ps4 due to low sales. While Ms have basically 0% chance of going under but have shown that they cut support quite easily if expectations aren't met.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







