HylianSwordsman said:
Kasz216 said:
the2real4mafol said:
thranx said:
Isnt that what the law is ther for? to help people protect their lands? I mean if its their land, and they dont want her there, what else can they do? I mean its their land isn't it? What are we supposed to have? Lawlessness? or are you only ok with your rights being protected and your beliefs, and what you feel for, but not for others? I am a little confused here. You want her rights protected, but dont seem to care for the other groups rights because you disagree with them and agree with her. She can have them banned from her property too if she wants.
|
What about the right to protest? I know in this case she was the only one which made it easier to prosecute but what if that town didn't want fracking near them. It just seems heavily one sided to those with money. I mean also the fracking company doesn't care what happens to that region once they get paid.
|
People do have a right to protest. On city property adjacent to what they are protesting.
Going on private land is tresspassing.
As for the dnagers of fracking... I'm guessing you are about as educated on fracking as you are GMOs.
|
Sounds to me like you're brainwashed by corporate propaganda. Why are you even bringing GMOs into this? Just because both issues involve public health concerns at the expense of corporations doesn't mean he supports the anti GMO movement.
|
Except he does support the GMO's movement.
I've brought this up because we've had many political conversations before where he only knew one side of the story.
He tends to not fully research out both sides of things before he gets upset.
