FlamingWeazel said:
http://digitalbattle.com/2008/02/20/ps3-sells-better-in-first-14-months-than-360/
|
Wow you are impressive. I said they didn't do good until after the price cut. I was right.. Yet you link me to some site that used this site. I linked you to worldwide sales. It was the price that killed it. I'm done talking to you.
You're void of facts. I just post month after month of sales, yet you link me to a 14 month sales comparison that uses this site. MY god.
These converstions have got pathetic. You always have to be right even if you change the topic of the argument in the first place. You are a complete contradiction. First 12 months both consoles where dead even. However if you look at sony's first 6 months like I said, you would see they sold very poorly. However You won't, you go off and find some random nonsense that has nothing to do with our original conversation. Have fun with that.
Sony's first year 6,017,487
Xbox 360's first year 5,933,110
Almost identical, without blueray. Remember PS3 was the cheapest blueray player on the market. XBox 360 didn't cut price in it's first year, they didn't cut price for 20 months (http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/08/07/xbox360.price.cut.reut/index.html). Sony did, Not only that, Sony just came off of the PS2 which sold 155 million unites world wide, to XBox 25,000 units. WHO TOOK, WHO's market share?
Like I said above, I'm going to ignore your posts, yesturday a guy called you out on the exact same thing i I'm. You change you original argument to back your view. It's called confirmation bias.