MGS: Good points: best storyline got to play as solid snake, best game on ps1 bad points: not enough sneaking there seemed to be a boss battle every five minutes for example you just battle ocelot meryl opens up the cargo door in the tank hanger you go through and have to fight raven in an m1 tank all this in less than five minutes of stealth
MGS2:good points: good storyline but you have to play through it about five times to fully understand the story ,good balance of stealth and boss battles.
first game to really show off the graphical power of ps2, improved gameplay to mgs1 bad points: playing as raiden he is the worst hero in videogaming history
MGS3: good points:good storyline,best gameplay in the MGS series, good balance of stealth and boss battles, killing raiden bad points: going to 1964 dont get me wrong it was an excellent game but why couldnt they have done a sequel to mgs2 nut in a way this is a good thing because now the sequel to mgs2 mgs4 will be on ps3 in hd cell prcessor powered graphics. Impossible bosses the first two had somewhat plausible bosses ( vamp was not a
real vampire hes just addicted to blood) but mgs3 jumped off the realm off reality an electric russian colonel, a bee summoner it was imposssible, playing as big boss hes a good character but not as good as solid snake people might
say there the same but snake seems more colder and more ruthless than big
boss
overall though mgs2 is the best and if it wasnt for raiden it would be the perfect video game
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
