DonFerrari said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
DonFerrari said:
A_C_E said:
Barozi said:
spemanig said:
kitler53 said:
and by fact you mean opinion and by opinion you mean unpopular opinion that absolutely no one agrees with.
glad we could find some common ground here...
|
It's as "factual" as saying that mouse is more precise than Analog. It's an opinion, but let's be real here. It's a fact, technicalities aside.
|
unless the touch screen is as big as a 50" screen, then no it's completely imprecise. Fact.
Fingers are far too big to be precise on such a small level. You would aim at hundreds of pixels all at the same time and hitting someone would just come down to luck.
|
This^
|
Not this... if the dev consider a area of hundreds of pixel around the target and your fat finger (not saying you have them fat) goes over it and you kill it you would fell like it's very precise and you would love it because you would be the man.
|
that still wouldnt make it as accurate as a analogue stick controller.
|
It won't be more accurate, but for the person that won't miss a shot it will seems like a fantastic accuracy (because they always think they were aiming right).
@Augustus... Move is more precise than WiiMote.
|
Agreed!
They use abundant amounts of "Auto-aim", which is something consoles also use a fair bit in order to compensate for the innacurate thumbsticks, just not to as much of an extreme.
I have the game "Modern Combat 4" on my Windows Phone, and as I pan the screen around with a finger it "locks" onto an enemy.
Basically, just more hand-holding.
