It's always precious when Nintendo loyal fans blame everything on third parties, while most would anyway buy Nintendo SW. It's more babbling and rambling out of spite.
In any generation on Nintendo consoles 1st parties have destroyed 3rd parties in sales, you can put that as a strenght of Ninty IPs, a loyal userbase, shitty or lazy devs or what you like... But I fail to see why 3rd parties would be on a scheme to undermine Nintendo since PS1 era. No company put work to sell less, and companies/people is kind of lazy, they will try the easier way. So if with the same effort they will sell a lot better on PS360/Ps4One than on Wii/WiiU why would they go a extra mile to sell better on a platform that have a historic of selling bad on 3rd parties? While people like to say Sony use 3rd parties as clutches and sell less than them. That is basically the reason why Sony have so much 3rd party support even without moneyhat.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
