By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r said:
DonFerrari said:
A_C_E said:
Barozi said:
spemanig said:
kitler53 said:

 

and by fact you mean opinion and by opinion you mean unpopular opinion that absolutely no one agrees with.

glad we could find some common ground here...


It's as "factual" as saying that mouse is more precise than Analog. It's an opinion, but let's be real here. It's a fact, technicalities aside.

unless the touch screen is as big as a 50" screen, then no it's completely imprecise. Fact.

Fingers are far too big to be precise on such a small level. You would aim at hundreds of pixels all at the same time and hitting someone would just come down to luck.

This^

Not this... if the dev consider a area of hundreds of pixel around the target and your fat finger (not saying you have them fat) goes over it and you kill it you would fell like it's very precise and you would love it because you would be the man.

that still wouldnt make it as accurate as a analogue stick controller.

It won't be more accurate, but for the person that won't miss a shot it will seems like a fantastic accuracy (because they always think they were aiming right).

@Augustus... Move is more precise than WiiMote.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."