North America versus Europe - who would win in an all out war?

[the2real4mafol]

-CraZed- said:

the2real4mafol said:
If America couldn't win in the many 3rd world countries it bullied then what chance does it have on Europe?

Europe has 700 million people, America has 300 million. So you are already outnumbered there.
We have some of the best run armies. Britain, Germany, Turkey and Russia.

The only thing America has is better military technology but time and time again this hasn't been what has won wars, at least not guaranteed to anyway.

It's the will to fight that win wars.

Unless America used nukes on us, i don't think they would win. But with Britain, France and Russia also having them that's unlikely too.

This is an interesting thread but an unlikely scenario I hope

The reason America "couldn't win in the many 3rd world countries" (even though that statement is patently false) is because we never waged all out war as to the thread OPs question. The US is notorious for Nation building and being PC in its approach to other nation's indigenous populations. In an all out, no holds barred war the US fighting force is second to none. And once the chains are off there is no limit to how much damage a combat brigade can inflict on an enemy force. Mistaking our kindness for weakness is a mistake.

The US has better technology AND better warriors making use of that technology. There is a reason when the $#!t hits the fan the world looks to the US to step in and handle it.

You can't actually win a war without winning hearts and minds of it's inhabitants, otherwise you would just end up massacring or discriminating against them all. Just like the "great" imperial powers