Rath said:
No as in 'no he is not an idiot'. Either no or yes would have meant the same thing there. |
Then your statement made little sense. You said that he was a good honest man, which does nothing to imply that he is not an idiot, and you said that he would make a terrible president, which only further supports that notion that he is an idiot. The evidence in your sentence conflicted with your initial assertion.







