Why Games With Gold doesn't bother competing with PS+...

[sales2099]

mutantclown said:

sales2099 said:

They don't understand because they stole our culture, but they will.

You subscribe because you have to, not because there are incentives. That said I do like Games for Gold better. The games are actually yours to keep and 2 games per month is more then enough....I don't want so many games that I don't know what to do with them.

 

Do what with old-ass games? Oh yeah, NOTHING, since I have already played them or don't give two shits about them. And who says I may even like these miserable 2 games? What If I don't like one of them, what if I don't care for any of them? The more the merrier, in the end, it's the same for me, I need to be paying to get something, and I'm getting a lot less even if it's "permanent" with Xbox Live. I have no use for permanent crap like "DEFENSE GRID" either.

lol entitled much? Given 360's 80 million+ install base and the individual sales of every game they give away.......you just sound selfish and petty. You get 24 games....permanently yours, and you wanna complain that a few might not appeal to you and that you allready played them? Wow.....

By the way, Defense Grid has a meta of 82. Its a solid game. Guess you aren't a gamer that doesn't appreciate under-the-radar quality.