Kyuu said:
You could hypothetically stress a high-end PC at 1080p/30fps with the right amount of in-game details, polygons, objects and particles. Res/FPS are meaningless without context. I've said this before and I'll say it again: Tekken 5 DR Online on PS3 runs at 1080p/60fps! Someone could misleadingly use this to show PS3 is superior to X1 and even PS4. T5DR is a last generation game that apparently performs better than the new Killer Instinct (as far as the resolution/fps argument goes) Some multiplats are"mathmatcially" running as much as twice better on a $100 cheaper PS4. not based on resoultion and framerate alone but all cacluations. With both systems reaching their full potential (specs on paper), Xbox ONE will still be at least 50% behind. The surprise was the difference between the first batch of multiplats was even bigger than 50% But I have to admit that I'm sick of the "PS4 is more powerful!!!!!!!" obsession. I think it's clear which console is graphically superior but it doesn't end with graphics anyway. We didn't prefer PS2 over Xbox for the weaker graphics did we? |
The thing about the PS2 is that Sony fans were saying back then that graphics don't matter when their system of choice was the less powerful graphically and then when the PS3 comes out then do a complete 180 and said the graphics are the end be all of gaming and that's why people say Sony fans are the worst.