JayWood2010 said:
He isnt really wrong about what he is saying. (He is talking about N4G) |
I think the only issue is that when Microsoft announce 30 frames-per-second it is usually accompanied by a lower resolution such as Dead Rising 3 being 720p or Ryse being 900p, both of which have unstable frame-rates that can often fall below 30 frames-per-second. Or it is a multi-platform game that runs at a superior frame-rate on the PlayStation 4, whilst also running at a superior resolution - the only example I can think of is Tomb Raider: Definite Edition. I tend to stay out of the bickering, but Microsoft themselves have previously said that they deliberately did not targeted high-end graphics with their new console, so I guess the fan-boys (all of which are awful and just as bad as each other) for PlayStation like to point that out, whilst the Xbox fan-boys try to say there will be parity when that will never be the case unless the PlayStation version is deliberately gimped.
Yes, Sony recently made a loss, but that is nothing new. It is not news, it is to be expected. Their being in profit is the bigger news as that is something relatively new.
Edit: Regarding the frame-rate of The Order: 1886 I believe this IS a design choice, as by the sounds of things there are some very sophisticated effects at play, and they are going for a cinematic feel. The same was claimed about Ryse (900p being a design choice), but I believe that was more of a hardware limitation as it would have looked phenomenal in 1080p and that cannot be denied. Ryse was aiming to be all pretty, so to choose a lower resolution doesn't make sense.