By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
aryu said:
snyps said:
aryu said:
snyps said:
aryu said:

In that case, no game is better than the Nintendo World Championships 1990 on the NES because it is the most expensive.

the argument is in regards to price justification. besides ppl don't buy nwc 90 to play with it.


In that case why would someone buy ICO PS2 or WindWaker GC when they could own it on PS3/WiiU respectively in a higher resolution?


to play it on their gamecube ps2. 

 Are you kidding me? it's more likely that people buy these games for these prices to collect them. If you wanted to play it, you would've bought it when it was out or when the console was still alive and kicking. Why buy a game that costs more than the console? Also price does not reflect quality as shown by my post about NWC90! so your argument about price justification is just ridiculous. ICO was and still is a masterpiece.

ico is a strange piece of work but ultimately it's an escort puzzle mission with a sentimental quality to it.  Not game of the year material imo. Eye of the beholder maybe. Sure ur right they buy to collect but it's a good playable experience unlike nwc90.  They get to enjoy playing it, not just owning it. I think Windwaker is more comparable to Combat evolved as far as craftsmanship.  I don't know how much that remake cost at launch but i'd say near full price would be acceptable.