By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Conina said:
curl-6 said:
Conina said:
curl-6 said:

They don't count towards the winning of a generation that has passed.

And who has decided that rule, that after a certain point no further hardware or software sales of a console count anymore?

The United Nations Organization? The Guinness Book? The Mighty Gods of VGC? You? Was it a proclaimed agreement of all console manufacturers? Was it even a question in former generations when the gaps were uncatchable?

It's common sense. You can't win a race after the baton's been passed.

No, it's not. If it were common sense, that "the race is over" and further sales mean nothing, then why are these consoles been sold for another few years, produce further revenue and profit and strenghthen the perceived value of these consoles and their portfolio?

The race-analogy is your own mantra you are repeating over and over again, nothing more.

You can't "win" a generation if during that generation you were consistently behind, and only crawled ahead years after a new generation began.

And you can't win a gen while being outsold by the last place during the whole last half and after next gen start.





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."