By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 06 February 2014
Edit Thread
Conina said:
curl-6 said:

They don't count towards the winning of a generation that has passed.

And who has decided that rule, that after a certain point no further hardware or software sales of a console count anymore?

The United Nations Organization? The Guinness Book? The Mighty Gods of VGC? You? Was it a proclaimed agreement of all console manufacturers? Was it even a question in former generations when the gaps were uncatchable?

Nintendo onwers decided so wii could win this gen, but ignore it so snes can beat genesis (after ps1 being launched).

actually a console selling strong after launch of newer ones is proof of dominance and relevance. I bet Nintendo isn't happy about "winning" gen 7 while vanishing mis-gen





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."