| Mr Puggsly said:
Activision basically said they were getting small piece of Xbox Live money. I recall Sony fans getting angry about that and saying Activision is taking money from people not playing CoD. Considering they are big reason people subscribe, it seems fair to give them a piece of Xbox Live money. EA operates their own servers and I think we can all agree it would be best if they didn't. Anyhow, from my understanding publishers benefit financially from not having to operate their own servers on Xbox Live. I'm not sure who else is getting money directly from MS. I completed ME3, but I never played it online so I don't know anything about "galactic readiness." I'll just say single player and online play should be kept seperate. |
They can have a piece of the money, as you say it's only right but as they can record the games people play, they could surely work it out like that.
The non operating their own servers is only for One, is it not? Titanfall on 360 and PC, does that have this benefit? The biggest other online played games on Live are mainly MS owned (now) and so doubt many other get money. EA due to FIFA and Madden?
My first play through was without playing online, there was an extra ending I didn't know about until I played online, it unlocked because I played online. This is unforgivable as far as I'm concerned because it means I had to play online to do it properly, I really can't understand what was going through their head when they did that. I hope to god they don't pull similar crap in DA:I.
Hmm, pie.
