Somini said:
I'm sure you didn't mean to offend, i mean look how nicely you've worded everything. I never said i don't trust the website so keep your assumptions to yourself. We're on a forum and discussing stuff with everyone's opinion in the mix. You want a discussion facts only go attend a scientific seminar. I'll keep posting my opinion thank you very much and don't go likening me someone who's only on board when the situation fits my view, that may be your thing, but certainly. All in your comment couldn't be fuller of assumptions. Thank you for contributing nothing but flaming/jabs to the topic. |
I'm not talking of opinions in general, you are basically saying this sites numbers are wrong. All I'm saying is, posting your opinion on a tracking websites numbers, in your case, against those numbers, is an opinion that has no backing in fact. Vgc isn't perfect, but, their numbers are more based on factual evidence than your gut feeling is. Why argue over a tracking websites numbers when you have no ground to do so? They do a lot of footwork to come up to these numbers, actual work, you are just "saying" you think they're wrong.... But on what grounds? You have none. And seriously, I meant no offence, just saying what I'm seeing, I'm sorry if I offended you, not my intent.