| Kaizar said:
|
In any self-defense class they will tell you to run away from from the threat and call the cops, and only use physical contact when it's necessary. Trayvon did none of those things, and we have proof of that.
| Kaizar said:
It doesn't matter if Travyon did or didn't have any criminal past' because manslaughter is manslaughter, and a person should always take responsibly for taking a life, without cowarding away from there own action that he is suppose to be pride of, according to his account. |
I'm sure no one would blame you if you kill a robber who's shooting bullets at your family and trying to kill them. Why would you be held accountable for protecting your family from that? There are cases where it's justifiable to kill someone.
| Kaizar said:
It didn't kill as a last resort, he killed as a first resort out of the numerous different ways he couldn't have handle his version of what happen. Pew all know George Zimmerman killed as a first resort, and that's by going by his account. Therefore he is 100% guilty of manslaughter base on his own account for crying out loud. |
Stop saying false things. Zimmerman used the gun as a last resort, we have concrete proof of that. We have a strong witness saying that Zimmerman was calling for help and trying to defend himself from the flurry of punches that Trayvon was throwing, and this happened for a while. After a few minutes of Zimmerman trying to get away and recieving a beating from Trayvon, he then used the gun and shot only once.
Zimmerman would have to shoot straight away at Trayvon and be spared from the beating for you to have an argument that he used as a first resort.
