| petroleo said: even thou if it was at 400 it would be still a inferior machine plain and simple, the problem with the xbone is its hardware and price, so if it was 400 still the PS4 would be the better choice by a big margin. I mean just look what some developers are saying, developers are putting raw code into the PS4 dev kit and it already reaching full HD and 60 frames, I think War thunder developer said this and Tomb Raider dev too, is just freaking insane!, meanwhile the xbone they need to squezze whatever they can into the xbone to just achieve a barely 30 frames or a sub hd ?, and this freaking thing cost 500 bucks ? flooded with microtransactions on Forza, Ryse, etc ? Seriously people theres absolutely nothing intelligent on investing on a xbone :/ |
At the moment the opposite is true?
With Kinect included, the Xbox One has a variety of features that are not available to the PS4. It also currently has better games, and a lineup that is arguably stronger than the PS4's.
Certainly the PS4 is marginally more powerful, a gap that appears to be less meaningful than that seperating the PS2 and Xbox.
At $100 more expensive, its quite simple to argue that the PS4 is an easier purchase. At the same price, feature for feature, the PS4 becomes a much harder sell.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
