By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mohasus said:
Imaginedvl said:

I believe this is true, in my humble oppinon :) Mouse is more accurate (at least you get more precision) alone but when you combine both sticks (controller), not only you are getting more accuracy but also it feels way more natural than a keyboard/mouse combo. It takes a while to become really good with a controller but it is really rewarding and it actually really feel ackward to move like  robot with a keyboard after that.


It isn't, that's why they are adding aim assist to controller players on PC. You may be better using a controller because you are used to it, but that's it. Didn't Microsoft cancel cross-platform gaming on Live because PC players always won?

Back on topic, I don't really care. Even if they didn't kill the servers, the player base will be way smaller in a few years and everyone will have moved to the sequels.

Funny, I always add "in my oppinion" but in your case you believe to speak the absolute truth, anyway.

I was a PC gamer playing mainly shooters and while it has been not easy at first to play with a controller (because of the aiming); after taking the time to master it: I can tell you for sure that it is its superiorities in certain areas that made it (for me) a more balanced/accurate option... Being able to aim a bit faster with a mouse is nothing compared to the natural feeling of the controller (moving arround, strafing, all analogic); I defintely (and I'm not the only one looking at a lot of different metrics) believe that a controller is more natural/accurate (on average) than a keyboard/mouse combo.

Also, other than pure speculation/assumption, do you have anything to back the bolded part (official words from Microsoft?).