By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Badassbab on 02 February 2014
Edit Thread
mutantsushi said:

OK, what is it's 'inferiority'?
Besides displacing GPU cores, and 32mb window constraining rendering approaches, the real world memory thruput is SLOWER.
As I wrote, if MS believes otherwise, and wants to highlight an area where it is superior, it can publish real-game memory thruput stats.

They haven't done so, even for exclusives.
The title is in conformance with that reality. I don't see anything wrong with a thread title reflecting reality.

There is no rule that thread titles MUST ONLY exactly repeat a quote they reference, and cannot be 'made up' by the person creating the thread.
The 1st post contains the accurate quote, up-front for everybody to see and analyze, nothing is being hidden.


If the thread title bears no resemblance to the article it's supposedly refering to then it shouldn't be the thread title OR it shouldn't be refering to THAT article. In the article it clearly states and quotes that the ESRAM is faster than GDDR5 just not by much and that's 32MB is too small and so causing bottlenecks. Constrast that with the SPIN put in the thread title by the host which is not only nowhere to be found in the article but also poor grammar. 

It is not about what YOU think or believe to be true. It is about quoting from your own source accurately to provide the evidence. If you cannot see the spin and the fact that the host DID NOT QUOTE HIS OWN SOURCE CORRECTLY and REARRANGED THE QUOTE to suit his own bias WITHOUT PROVIDING ANOTHER SOURCE TO BACK UP HIS/HER CLAIM  than there's nothing more I can say to you on this matter.