By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:

Wanting people to finish the game they start is reasonable, wanting people that rage quit to be banned isn't. You are acting egoystical in desiring that anyone that doesn't make your experience better to be barred... It's the same posture people had about always online and DRM, saying it was good because they were always online and never sell their games or buy second hand.

lol that is not even close to the same situation. Sorry, it's entirely different to expect someone to finish a socially agreed upon contract, like finishing an online game you start. And it's entirely different to be ok with people being punished for being dicks who rage quit (aka their own actions) than it is to be ok with the features of some product because they mesh with you.

I bolded the only part of your response that is correct or relevant. Yeah, that is reasonable. And people being punished for not doing that, is also reasonable. Not only can it make them better players, it makes everyone elses experience better. I'm just curious, are you against people exploiting glitches in an online game getting banned too? Not going to respond any more, kudos to DH, I am buying their game day one when I get an Xbone just for awesome decisions like this.