By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
J_Allard said:
DonFerrari said:
J_Allard said:
DonFerrari said:

I would say that more often than not you and other people are fine with anything as long as it benefits you even if in detriment of others.

You mean I need to care about the experience for people who rage quit and ruin the competitive online gaming? Uh.... no.


A social and reasonable human being should think about their kins even if they behave in a way that he doesn't like. But it seems that around here we can complain about other people behaviour and still make the same mistakes.

I think this is all shits n giggles from some of you just seeing what responses you can get, lol @ reasonable.

Not sure what is unreasonable about wanting an online opponent to finish a game they start.

Wanting people to finish the game they start is reasonable, wanting people that rage quit to be banned isn't. You are acting egoystical in desiring that anyone that doesn't make your experience better to be barred... It's the same posture people had about always online and DRM, saying it was good because they were always online and never sell their games or buy second hand.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."