J_Allard said:
People rage quit because they know they are going to lose and don't want to waste the time waiting around for the inevitable to happen. Handing them a loss doesn't make a difference. Look at Madden for an example. If you quit in Madden, whether it's by simply dashboarding the console, or pausing and quitting, or pausing and conceding, you get a loss. And you get a disconnect percentage penalty. And yet, rage quitting still plagues the online public games. The skill of the rage quitters is mostly irrelevant. People who are continuously rage quitting because they suck, might eventually move on to another game, but that takes time. And there's always fresh meat to take their place. But even rage quitters don't like people quitting on them. So if that's all they face, that's a great way for the developer to reinforce how shitty rage quitting is and get them to stop. If Madden not only gave you the auto loss and disconnect penalty but then went a step further and made sure you could only play other losers who rage quit, people would do it A LOT less. I know it's not an apple to apple comparison since football games take a lot longer, but the idea remains. And I am perfectly, 100% fine with someone who constantly rage quits no longer playing online. Awesome. |
I would say that more often than not you and other people are fine with anything as long as it benefits you even if in detriment of others.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







