badgenome said:
The problem with the second bit as I see it is that conflicts with the first part (to give to someone you have to take from someone else) and it invariably corrupts a democratic system once politicians figure out they can buy voters and voters figure out they can be bought (which takes about two seconds). |
Aren't politicians supposed to give voters what they want? In a democracy they are supposed to represent us, the voting public.
The bigger problem is the 2 party system, especially when they are essentially the same thing.
Anyway, while there are still people that are poor a welfare state is of total necessary. It's there to balance the field and give people essential services which everyone pays into. Only the state can do this, as they are the least likely to follow a profit motive above anything. Nothing wrong with making profits, but there is a problem when the system is cheated for greed like it is now. But yeah, i don't see how a welfare state can interfere with say property rights. No private property would be taken. But just remember not everyone is lucky enough to afford a house, so it's the state responsibility to give them houses or flats as the market won't help them.
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030







