Kasz216 said:
the2real4mafol said:
thranx said:
Isnt that what the law is ther for? to help people protect their lands? I mean if its their land, and they dont want her there, what else can they do? I mean its their land isn't it? What are we supposed to have? Lawlessness? or are you only ok with your rights being protected and your beliefs, and what you feel for, but not for others? I am a little confused here. You want her rights protected, but dont seem to care for the other groups rights because you disagree with them and agree with her. She can have them banned from her property too if she wants.
|
What about the right to protest? I know in this case she was the only one which made it easier to prosecute but what if that town didn't want fracking near them. It just seems heavily one sided to those with money. I mean also the fracking company doesn't care what happens to that region once they get paid.
|
People do have a right to protest. On city property adjacent to what they are protesting.
Going on private land is tresspassing.
As for the dnagers of fracking... I'm guessing you are about as educated on fracking as you are GMOs.
|
You can't be seriously telling me fracking is a good thing? I mean the evidence against it is very clear. It is an environmentally damaging practice, it has been proven. But because there is the potential to make tons of profit from it, any risk from fracking is ignored.
To be fair, i'm not against using gas as a fuel but there has to be another way without contaminating everyone's water supply. It's just not worth the risk. Water is increasingly valuable in this world.
Why not improve renewable energy or safety in nuclear energy instead of devastating the planet for profit?
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030
