Turkish on 31 January 2014
| globalisateur said: I am sorry but I have to disagree with Famousmortimer here. Esram alone is in fact in reality slower than GDDR5. Real benchmarks during ideal conditions have been done on both machines: - 140-150GB/s averaged at 145GB/s in best conditions using the best test available for Esram. Those are Microsoft ideal/best condition numbers and work for rare utilizations, most cases will reach maybe 100GB/s in fact. - 160GB/s done with a similar test on the GDDR5 ram by some developers, they can reach 91% of the total 176GB/s which is compatible with similar, on best conditions tests on GDDR5 ram on PC, maybe like 135GB/s in less ideal conditions. |
Hmm this is interesting, where were this tests done?
