Xbox One vs PS4: ESRAM slower than GDDR5, It's Bottleneck"

[FlamingWeazel]

walsufnir said:

FlamingWeazel said:

walsufnir said:

FlamingWeazel said:

Azzanation said:
ESRAM is better to have then not have. Its simple. Companies will learn to use it, just like how companies learnt how to use the PS3.

LOL no it isn't, x1 is not a well  designed piece of hardware and esram is a big reason. PC's dont have them for a reason either.

Yeah, esram/edram is not used, sure.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/3

*sigh*

Integrated weak graphics...thanks for proving my point. It's useless, and poor design.

Yeah, please just stop posting when no knowledge is present. Consoles use this type of RAM since PS2, it's not a bad solution. It's not as good as your holy cow, we all got what you want to say when you repeat your opinion in every thread and post, even if it's off-topic.

And thanks for not saying you were wrong with  " PC's dont have them for a reason either.".

You are the one lacking knowledge, esram being on consoles as the past only shows how poor the hardware was...esram is a bandaid solution, thank god cerney new this and changed it. It's why you never see high end PC's with it. It's called evolution.

360 had this as well it's not like developers don;t know the architecture.