FlamingWeazel on 31 January 2014
| Azzanation said: ESRAM is better to have then not have. Its simple. Companies will learn to use it, just like how companies learnt how to use the PS3. |
LOL no it isn't, x1 is not a well designed piece of hardware and esram is a big reason. PC's dont have them for a reason either.
esram is not CELL, the gap is way bigger it is nothing like ps3. x1 doesn;t have a cell or the power to close the gap like ps3 did. Esram is worse then a shared poool of gddr5, and it won't help offset a 40% GPU compute advantage.
