fallen said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Zappykins said:
Xen said:
Zappykins said:
Ugh, seriously? They already confirmed Halo 5 or whatever is 1080p60. Plus Forza and other games do it.
The GPU's between the two really aren't that different. Both are underpowered as they should have been 2.5 Tflops, but even then isn't that much of a change - as you need to double power for humans to really notice.
Stop spreading FUD! |
Yeah... the PS4's GPU is just ~50% more powerful, not that big a diffrence...
Stop spreading FUD!
|
Then why is the best looking game for the new gen a 2nd party game on the Xbox One?
|
Not sure what your point is, for one that's wrong. Also, tech is tech it's not magic the ps4 is considerably more powerfull, nearly every game has looked and ran better on ps4 for a reason. TEchnology is measureable, one os a lot more powerfull, nothing you say will ever change that.,
|
Ehh, in systems as complex as these me or you cant actually know, and there are millions of small variables that can overcme the large surface specs we know. Only somebody intimately involved in programming on both really knows.
Anyways, PS3 was inferior to 360 all last gen in multiplats, and PS2 way below Xbox before that, so big deal really. It's about time Sony finally got a turn I guess. People are just making a way bigger deal out of it now since Sony has the edge this time. We didn't have 500 page threads every time a PS3 multiplat was markedly inferior last gen. We swept it under the rug.
|
Not the ps3- 360 garbage. 360 had a better gpu, better memorty ps3 had cell, they were close. The gap is way bigger, ps4 gpu is way better, better memory, easier to code for. same architecture with ps4 having every advantage. This has been saiud numerous times yopu keep ignoring it, the fact people are still in denial about the power gap is hilarious.
x1 has no cell or power to catch up like ps3 did.
For someone who says we don't need these discussion you create enough threads and post an awfull lot about it. Do you work on MS pr team lol.
