gergroy on 30 January 2014
First of all, it is just a temporary injunction.
Secondly, this whole article just tells one side of the story. I dont think scroggins is as innocent as you think she is.
Thirdly, you dont like property rights? What if you owned a bunch of restraunts that served meat and a anti-meat protestor kept barging into your restraunts yelling at customers or sitting on tables or blocking employees so they couldnt do their job. You think that person should have the right to do that forever?
