By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FlamingWeazel on 29 January 2014
Edit Thread
sales2099 said:
FlamingWeazel said:
sales2099 said:
 

Jokes on you, shows what kind of person I am dealing with. You disapoint me and aren't as capable of depth as I gave you the benefit of the doubt for.

 

There is no reasoning with your post it's pure nonsense and delusion.  Please post more people in the consoel war agree lol, how can you even prove that or even use it as an argument. As for the winning side,. that would be sony and it's first party doing it and wiunning the right way.

 

Your entire argument falls apart with the fact the 360 had near double the install base in  the US, and launched a year earlier thus higher sales..... Nothing to do with the now. Last gen is history PS4 is already ahead it's a lot different ballgame now.

 

Want to make a sig bet titanfall doesn't do gears numbers?

Actually it is rooted in comparable gen over gen comparisons with data from this very site. Quite the opposite of nonsense.......just saying that both PS and Xbox fans quoted me in the thread and agreed that MS simply paid EA and that is all there is too it.

My argument revolved around 360 being a 5 month old console compared to X1 being 5 months old in March.....I openly admitted that this gen will change in regards to sequels due to PS4's lead, but that there is potential in securing the 1st instalment.

I told you Gears opening numbers......and between X1, 360, and PC, offcourse they will be on par. But that wasn't my argument. Comparing it to 360's March 2006 games (Oblivion/GRAW) make more sense.

You aren't even paying attention as I have to repeat things to you. Sigh...

Pointless last gen comparisons, Gears was not on the first xbox like titanfalls is also on 360, and did not launch on PC for a year later................ Titanfall won';t have near the impact gears did. GEars also had a great campaign and was a showcase for next gen graphics, not everyone is into fast paced MP.